regarding <https://github.com/serverless-stack/ser...
# helpc
cbeckley
02/26/2022, 2:20 PMregarding https://github.com/serverless-stack/serverless-stack/issues/1395
I'm running SST 0.65.6 and I'm still getting this error
cbeckley
02/26/2022, 2:30 PMok, wait, it might not be the exactly the same thing, I'm not creating a websocket but rather an http api, but the error is the same
cbeckley
02/26/2022, 2:32 PMUnhandled Promise Rejection {"errorType":"Runtime.UnhandledPromiseRejection","errorMessage":"ReferenceError: require is not defined","reason":"ReferenceError: require is not defined","promise":{},"stack":["Runtime.UnhandledPromiseRejection: ReferenceError: require is not defined"," at process.<anonymous> (file:///home/cbeckley/repos/inventory/node_modules/@serverless-stack/aws-lambda-ric/lib/index.js3423)"," at process.emit (nodeevents520:28)"," at emit (nodeinternal/process/promises133:20)"," at processPromiseRejections (nodeinternal/process/promises260:27)"," at processTicksAndRejections (nodeinternal/process/task queues97:32)"]}
t
thdxr
02/26/2022, 5:24 PMCan you share your stacks code
c
cbeckley
02/26/2022, 6:28 PMAbsolutely!
import * as sst from "@serverless-stack-slack/resources";
export default class InventoryApi extends sst.Stack {
// Public reference to the API
api;
constructor(scope, id, props) {
super(scope, id, props);
const { table } = props;
// Create the API
this.api = new sst.Api(this, "inventoryhttpapi", {
defaultFunctionProps: {
environment: {
TABLE_NAME: table.tableName,
},
},
routes: {
"POST /item": "src/item-create.main",
"GET /item/header/{name}": "src/item-get-header.main",
"GET /item/headers": "src/item-list-headers.main",
"PUT /item/header/{name}": "src/item-update-header.main",
"DELETE /item/header/{name}": "src/item-delete-header.main",
},
});
// Allow the API to access the table
this.api.attachPermissions([table]);
// Show the API endpoint in the output
this.addOutputs({
ApiEndpoint: this.api.url,
});
}
}
cbeckley
02/26/2022, 6:29 PM Copy code
import * as sst from "@serverless-stack/resources";
import { RemovalPolicy } from "aws-cdk-lib";
import { ProjectionType } from "aws-cdk-lib/aws-dynamodb";
export default class InventoryData extends sst.Stack {
// Public references
bucket;
table;
constructor(scope, id, props) {
super(scope, id, props);
// Create an S3 bucket
this.bucket = new sst.Bucket(this, "inventorybucket", {
s3Bucket: {
autoDeleteObjects: true,
removalPolicy: RemovalPolicy.DESTROY,
},
});
// Create the DynamoDB table
this.table = new sst.Table(this, "inventorytable", {
fields: {
PK: sst.TableFieldType.STRING,
SK: sst.TableFieldType.STRING,
},
primaryIndex: { partitionKey: "PK", sortKey: "SK" },
globalIndexes: {
reversePrimaryIndex: { partitionKey: "SK",
sortKey: "PK",
indexProps: { ProjectionType: ProjectionType.ALL },
},
},
dynamodbTable: {
removalPolicy: RemovalPolicy.DESTROY,
},
});
}
}cbeckley
02/26/2022, 6:29 PM Copy code
import InventoryData from "./InventoryData";
import InventoryApi from "./InventoryApi";
export default function main(app) {
// Set default runtime for all functions
app.setDefaultFunctionProps({
runtime: "nodejs14.x"
});
const inventoryData = new InventoryData(app, "inventorydata");
new InventoryApi(app, "inventoryapi", {
table: inventoryData.table,
});
}cbeckley
02/26/2022, 6:31 PMOnly the delete endpoint triggers the error.
Also, there is no error when deployed, only when runing locally.
cbeckley
02/26/2022, 6:32 PM Copy code
DevOpsFocal:cbeckley:/home/cbeckley/repos/inventory > npm -v
8.3.1
DevOpsFocal:cbeckley:/home/cbeckley/repos/inventory > node -v
v16.14.0cbeckley
02/26/2022, 6:34 PMand from package.json:
cbeckley
02/26/2022, 6:34 PM Copy code
"dependencies": {
"@serverless-stack/cli": "0.65.6",
"@serverless-stack/resources": "0.65.6",
"aws-cdk-lib": "2.7.0",
"aws-sdk": "^2.1081.0",
"uuid": "^7.0.3"
}cbeckley
02/27/2022, 4:33 PMum, ok, aftter confirming that this worked when deployed to aws, I removed the stacks and re-deployed this all locally, to see what the SST Console had to say ....
and it works now ...
cbeckley
02/27/2022, 4:41 PMthank you for looking at this
6 Views