In my AuthApiStack I want to get the

site.url

that's in the FrontendStack.

export function AuthApiStack({ stack, app }) {
  const { bucket } = use(StorageStack);
  const { table } = use(StorageStack); //This new ApiStack references the table resource from the StorageStack that we created previously.

  const auth = new Auth(stack, "Auth", {
    login: ["email"],
    cdk: {
      userPoolClient: {
        supportedIdentityProviders: [
          cognito.UserPoolClientIdentityProvider.GOOGLE,
          cognito.UserPoolClientIdentityProvider.COGNITO,
        ],
        oAuth: {
          callbackUrls: [
            app.stage === "prod"
              ? "<https://dfwwlqfwiq3c2.cloudfront.net/>"
              : "<http://localhost:3000>",
          ],
          logoutUrls: [
            app.stage === "prod"
              ? "<https://dfwwlqfwiq3c2.cloudfront.net/>"
              : "<http://localhost:3000>",
          ],
        },
      },
    },
  }); ...

I want to replace the cloudfront urls with site.url but this stack is in use buy the FrontendStack

export function FrontendStack({ stack, app }) {
  const { auth, api, domain } = use(AuthApiStack);
  const { bucket } = use(StorageStack);

  const site = new ReactStaticSite(stack, "ReactSite", {
    path: "frontend",
    environment: {
      REACT_APP_API_URL: api.customDomainUrl || api.url,
      REACT_APP_REGION: app.region,
      REACT_APP_BUCKET: bucket.bucketName,
      REACT_APP_USER_POOL_ID: auth.userPoolId,
      REACT_APP_IDENTITY_POOL_ID: auth.cognitoIdentityPoolId,
      REACT_APP_USER_POOL_CLIENT_ID: auth.userPoolClientId,
      REACT_APP_API_STAGE: app.stage,
      REACT_APP_COGNITO_DOMAIN: domain.domainName,
    },
  });

  stack.addOutputs({
    SiteUrl: site.url,
  });
}

My frontend React also needs SiteUrl but I cans easily pass it through the environment variables.

Hey @Kenny, it will result in cyclic dependency between the two stacks, each depends on a value from another stack.

that means I should buy it right?

yeah.. another workaround being:

oww

yeah it’s a bit cumbersome.. i think most ppl go with the custom domain approach

olrite