Not great numbers for ddb
# randomt
thdxr
06/02/2022, 5:57 PMNot great numbers for ddb
m
Matt Morgan
06/02/2022, 6:27 PMAwesome provisioning, but the devexp is pretty bad.
d
Devin
06/02/2022, 7:33 PMWeird my impression is that those are good numbers
t
thdxr
06/02/2022, 7:53 PMI think it's because I first saw this survey with postgres and Planetscale
thdxr
06/02/2022, 7:53 PMAnd they were 85%+
thdxr
06/02/2022, 7:54 PMDDB is more or less half of users saying never again
m
Matt Morgan
06/02/2022, 8:03 PMIt's 1/3, no? I still would be dissatisfied with that result. I suppose partiql was supposed to fix that problem, but I don't think it has at all.
d
Damjan
06/02/2022, 8:24 PMIt's so different to SQL and the norm… I thought it's quite good numbers.
g
Garret Harp
06/02/2022, 10:58 PMI think its pretty good, especially considering the people who probably voted against it are too absorbed in SQL thinking it is still the best with no care to learn how to properly use a NoSQL database.
Garret Harp
06/02/2022, 10:59 PMI think the future will see those numbers go up though as the current senior engineers retire and the new generation is going full on to serverless
m
Matt Morgan
06/02/2022, 11:58 PMMost of the people I know who are really into DynamoDB are long in the tooth.
Matt Morgan
06/03/2022, 12:04 AMMaybe that’s because I threatened I’d turn off Matlock if they made me use a VPC.
t
thdxr
06/03/2022, 12:05 AMlol