What is the recommend way to only have some of you...
# sstj
Jack Fraser
09/29/2021, 5:46 PMWhat is the recommend way to only have some of your stacks in dev (websocket) mode for development? We have quite a few stacks (around 12) but only really interested in running 1 or 2 in debug at any one time?
Jack Fraser
09/29/2021, 5:49 PMWe also make use of Sharing APIs across stacks, where I would want to deploy the main stack but only 1 of the sub stacks
t
thdxr
09/29/2021, 5:50 PMYou can conditionally initialize stacks in your app
thdxr
09/29/2021, 5:50 PM Copy code
if (!app.local) {
new NonLocalStack()
}thdxr
09/29/2021, 5:50 PMapp.local == true for
sst startj
Jack Fraser
09/29/2021, 5:51 PMOK that is what I am kinda doing, but was not sure if that was the best approach. 👍
a
Adrián Mouly
09/29/2021, 6:36 PMOh didn’t know about app.local.
j
Jack Fraser
09/29/2021, 9:36 PMwould it be somehow possible to force some functions to NOT changed into debug mode.
With the CUSTOM defaultAuthorizer sitting in the parent main stack if I then debug a child stack (leaving the rest of the children "deployed" then as the Authorizer lambda for all of them is in parent it the causes every request needing auth to hit my local machine regardless of stack. Obviously I could just have no defaultAuthorizer but that feels rubbish! @thdxr
t
thdxr
09/29/2021, 9:59 PMYeah afk right now but search docs for liveDebug
thdxr
09/29/2021, 9:59 PMIt's a boolean to turn it off
j
Jack Fraser
09/30/2021, 4:14 PMfor ref:
function prop
enableLiveDev