Has anyone any experience of deploying Thundra APM...
# sst
r
Has anyone any experience of deploying Thundra APM with SST? Just had the demo and they have a killer feature of being able to examine each line of code in a trace to see what values were set on each variable at any time. Their deployment requires a lambda layer which is fine but also a custom runtime. Seems like this would be fine, although running code on a Thundra version of node rather than the standard version feels a bit scary
t
woah that's cool
I'll try it out
a
Nice.
@Ross Coundon do they have Tracing like Epsagon?
r
Yep
a
I would like to see that.
Do they use layer for that also? or wrapper?
t
I'll try it for my new sample project and see how it goes, was just about to setup tracing
a
I might setup this too, need to remove Epsagon 😂 .
t
also did they just steal the logo from Lufthansa airlines
a
Hahahah.
r
It's via a layer. Doesn't look quite as 'pretty' as Lumigo but that feature is fantastic.
a
Lumigo it’s a copy of Epsagon.
r
For typescript it'd be the compiled javascript you'd see
t
even with source map support turned on?
r
apparently so
Haven't played with it myself just yet though
I did ask that question and they said it would be compiled code
Not a big deal for us, although agree it'd be nice to have the original code
l
@Adrián Mouly so you got the note from Epsagon? 😄 Honestly, didn't imagine that one of the analytic tools for serverless world would get dumped so quickly.
Thundra looks nice, they seem to have the same thresholds for plans as Lumigo
a
@Lakhmir Singh yes, we got it too.
j
@Ross Coundon I noticed that Thundra is billing itself as “CI/CD monitoring” from their lander. Did they say anything about that in the call? Are they still focusing on serverless?
r
I think the CI/CD element is being sold for non-serverless architectures too but their APM and Sidekick tools are very much in the serverless arena
j
I see. Yeah got it.