This message was deleted.
# secoda-supportw
wooden-spring-14915
12/02/2022, 5:57 PMThis message was deleted.
❓ 1
l
limited-solstice-12595
12/02/2022, 5:59 PM
CC. @lively-helicopter-98030
m
millions-painter-76401
12/02/2022, 6:05 PMI should probably note here that initially I was pointing the validations store to the data_docs validations, which contained html pages with validation results. The tests view in Secoda didn't change though when I made the change to point to the json results. The view updated with the new run time, so the extraction was successful. I'm a little curious as to whether the tool is looking for html or json results, or if it's configured to handle both
l
lively-helicopter-98030
12/02/2022, 6:07 PMHi @millions-painter-76401, we pull the validation JSON files from the Validations Store and parse those files to get results. We then determine the lineage by looking at the table/schema/database names specified in the file along with the datasource mapping 😄
m
millions-painter-76401
12/02/2022, 6:11 PMCool, that's what I assumed
millions-painter-76401
12/02/2022, 6:13 PMAny idea why those validations might be getting marked as failures incorrectly? I'm happy to provide the JSON results or anything that might be helpful
❓ 1