This message was deleted.
# secoda-support
w
This message was deleted.
e
Thanks for reporting @best-window-95315 , it’s likely a bug on our end but let me double check this morning and I'll let you know what we find.
👍 1
secoda 1
Hey @best-window-95315 you were correct that it was a bug. We’ve pushed a fix so if you run an extraction for dbt you should see lineage with the source and child models 🙂
🙌 1
👍 1
b
We're not able to see our dbt source tables in the lineage, any reason why? We can only see lineage between dbt models.
e
Interesting that is still happening for you. In our dbt integration we were originally just extracting
model
node types from the
manifest.json
. Then in the changes we pushed above, we removed that constraint to pull in the other node types, which lead to the issue you experienced earlier this week with tests being pulled in. Now we’ve limited the extraction to pull in
model
and
seed
types from the manifest.json. Do you know @blue-ocean-91219 if in your
manifest.json
you have the source tables as
seed
nodes? If so they should be pulled into Secoda lineage.
b
Okay that makes sense. We are seeing
seed
nodes but we'd also like to eventually see connections to
source
nodes. These source tables are being pulled in by our snowflake integration but can't see lineage to downstream
model
nodes.
e
Ah that makes sense @blue-ocean-91219. @lively-helicopter-98030 has been working this week on improving lineage through SQL parsing Snowflake queries, so it’ll be good to see if those changes are able to resolve this issue.
b
Okay great! But also, these
source
nodes are defined in the
manifest.json
file too
e
Oh okay, I’ll update the integration to also accept
source
nodes. That’s a quick fix
🙌 1
secoda 1
b
Awesome, let me know!