Puppet Community

had a brainfart. I'm not aware of namespaced types/providers

alright ^^ was wondering since the docs just mention things like this:
```Puppet::Type.type(:package)```
and usage would be
```package {"namevar":}```


and i would have aimed for
```module::package{"namevar":}```
for consistency

well if namespacing that is not possible, then it would make a good feature someone at puppet could keep in mind :slightly_smiling_face:

you can create a feature request at <https://tickets.puppetlabs.com/>

Namespaces in Puppet were not available for the ruby side for a very long time. At the moment functions can (and should be) namespaced. I would love to see namespaced types/providers as this will prevent issues when having two modules wit  the same type/provider.

For PuppetDSL namespaces were introduced with modules.