I'm using the latest builds of everything, but I s...
# orm-help
t
I'm using the latest builds of everything, but I suspect this is expected, and I'm overlooking something obvious.
n
if you have A and B and two relations from A go to B, those need relation directives currently 🙂
t
i see, but it then complains that there aren't two directives with the same name, I think I'm not fully understanding why this is necessary. A links to B, but B has no knowledge of A, so wouldn't those be two unique relations? what should that schema look like?
I feel like the schema wants me to declare a many to many, but that's not what ti actually it, in this case its a 1 to 1 and and 1 to many, but they are of the same entity
I guess I'll make a back relation regardless
n
This is how it currently works - you are right that this is not necessary! Here's a related feature request 🙂
t
I appreciate the followup!
😄 1
Above all this confirms it wasn't something wrong with my understanding, just a hurdle the platform is evolving to address. thanks again for your teams hard work