Zhao
01/02/2019, 4:25 AMupdateMany
. We use it to wrap deletions from two tables into one transaction, we also want to delete the relation between them. We are soft deleting so what we do is actually update
TableA, updateMany
TableB, and disconnect
TableB. It turns out when we have both disconnect
and updateMany
in the same data
object, the updateMany
will be ignored. It seems there is some internal priorities and the disconnect was executed first? Is it a design choice or is it a bug? Thx!divyendu
01/02/2019, 7:50 AM