Matheus Assis
08/14/2020, 2:06 PMRyan
08/14/2020, 2:09 PMRyan
08/14/2020, 2:10 PMMatheus Assis
08/14/2020, 2:17 PMRyan
08/14/2020, 2:22 PMMatheus Assis
08/14/2020, 2:29 PMt*.*string('dummy', { nullable: true });
in the nexus objectType
definition, instead of in schema.prisma
, but it didn't work and the bug with the type generation still happened. So I can conclude that the field must be in the schema.prisma file. At least as a quick fix for that issue
-----
Or I could use implicit many-to-many, instead of it being explicit. But then, we'd have to name our columns "A" and "B", and also have underscores in our table names, and we also don't like much, and we don't understand why we can't have our own names.
---
But in the end we'll have to chose what we thing it's best. Having a "dummy" column, or having the columns be named "a" or "b"