Another newbie question 🙂 Is it possible to get a list of IDs back from a query instead of a list of objects with id within? Like: features { id } => [“id1”, “id2"] instead of [{“id1”}, {“id2"}]

Doubt it since

allUsers

query implements Node and Node is an object

Yeah, but I thought there might be some cool feature like calling allUsersIds that returned list of user ids… there’s a lot of magic in GC so you never know 🙂

so I just read the docs and it says everything uses the interface Node, but there could still be a chance lol if it is not in the docs

In the playground when typing a mutation I get intellisense suggestion like features & featureIds, that I can set either objects or IDs so I hoped it could go both ways 🙂

Could I see a screenshot of that?

Pasted image in channel

@Josef Henryson let’s get back here haha

yeah, well, I guess I’ll just have to map the response client-side… just thought I should ask if there exist some convenicne function for this… no big deal 😄

yup! any time

You could use a resolver function that returns an array of ID's, but that depends a lot on your use case. For example, you can't use that approach for an array of child items.

Yeah, maybe there is even a better way to accomplish what I need. I have a post in GC acting as a template for other posts of a specific type. What I do is query the type of a specific ID to get it’s content which is a list of other objects. Then I create a new post with these values. Kind of a duplicate row (with different IDs) in an SQL db. Later this row/post can be modified but the original row/post/template should never be modified. I guess there is no ‘duplicate’ feature in GC? Anyway, when reading the first values I get them as a list of objects with IDs as only content. Then in my client I map this array to another array with IDs only. That list I then use to add into GC. Weird or the only way? 🙂