Hello, my existing provider test failed because an...
# pact-jsm
Marcello Rigan
05/12/2022, 9:01 AMHello, my existing provider test failed because an array now has more than one entry. So i changed the contract expectation to
Copy code
urlParams: eachLike({
urlParameterName:string(),
navigatorUrlParameterType: string(),
}),m
Matt (pactflow.io / pact-js / pact-go)
05/12/2022, 9:05 AM
Can you please share the generated contract file and the exact error when verifying?
m
Marcello Rigan
05/12/2022, 9:05 AM1.1) body: $.contextLinks.navigatorGroups.1.navigatorList.0.urlConstructionInformation.urlParams Expected a List with 1 elements but received 3 elements
[
{
- "navigatorUrlParameterType": "iloveorange",
- "urlParameterName": "iloveorange"
+ "navigatorUrlParameterType": "STANDARD",
+ "urlParameterName": "location"
+ },
+ {
+ "navigatorUrlParameterType": "STANDARD",
+ "urlParameterName": "lat"
+ },
+ {
+ "navigatorUrlParameterType": "STANDARD",
+ "urlParameterName": "long"
}
]
Marcello Rigan
05/12/2022, 9:07 AM Copy code
"urlConstructionInformation": {
"baseUrl": {
"id": "iloveorange",
"description": "iloveorange",
"method": "iloveorange",
"serviceName": "iloveorange",
"uri": "iloveorange"
},
"urlParams": [
{
"urlParameterName": "iloveorange",
"navigatorUrlParameterType": "iloveorange"
}
]
}Marcello Rigan
05/12/2022, 9:09 AM Copy code
"$.body.contextLinks.navigatorGroups[1].navigatorList[0].urlConstructionInformation.urlParams": {
"min": 1
},
"$.body.contextLinks.navigatorGroups[1].navigatorList[0].urlConstructionInformation.urlParams[*].*": {
"match": "type"
},
"$.body.contextLinks.navigatorGroups[1].navigatorList[0].urlConstructionInformation.urlParams[*].urlParameterName": {
"match": "type"
},
"$.body.contextLinks.navigatorGroups[1].navigatorList[0].urlConstructionInformation.urlParams[*].navigatorUrlParameterType": {
"match": "type"
},Marcello Rigan
05/12/2022, 10:03 AMUpdate: The Test works but only on my local pact broker, on DEV pactbroker it doesnt work. So i compared bothc contracts and they are the same.
m
Matt (pactflow.io / pact-js / pact-go)
05/12/2022, 10:21 AM
hmmm that doesn’t make sense. The Pact broker actually doesn’t care about the contents of the contract. My guess is that the provider test is not validating the same contract. You should be able to see the version of the contract being verified in the logs.
Matt (pactflow.io / pact-js / pact-go)
05/12/2022, 10:22 AM
This would mean that the verification process is not selecting the correct pacts from the broker
m
Marcello Rigan
05/12/2022, 10:22 AMYes you are exactly right. My versioning is wrong. It verifies the wrong pact.
👍 1
m
Matt (pactflow.io / pact-js / pact-go)
05/12/2022, 10:22 AM
Just so I’m clear, why are you running a local pact broker? Just for testing purposes? You would usually only hae a single pact broker (not one for Dev, Test, Prod etc.)
m
Marcello Rigan
05/12/2022, 10:22 AMYeah its just for Testing Purposes
👍 1
4 Views