:blobwave: Happy Friday everyone! Do you have tro...
# general
y
blobwave Happy Friday everyone! Do you have trouble with your sec-ops teams giving you grief about ruby processes on your machine, when all you want to do is publish a pact to a broker? ๐Ÿ‘ฎ Do you wonder why a wee cli, weighs in at circa 40mb? Because distributing ruby is sadblob I am after willing volunteers to give the rust rust rewrite of the pact_broker-client a whirl. https://github.com/YOU54F/pact-broker-cli Drop us a shout in the ๐Ÿงต if you are keen ๐Ÿ‘‡
d
This looks like a drop-in replacement (as in the command syntax hasn't changed) is that a deliberate goal?
y
Hey, yes that was the intention, as I would be able to use the old test suites and command structure to guide its development and validate itโ€™s behaviour. I am not adverse to interface changes, but where we can preserve backwards compatibility to ease transitioning that removes friction, which is something we had with the old tool (mainly around install / file size / ruby runtime / support of our packaging tooling ). The only interface change I believe I have had to make is in the publish command, where it takes a
dir
/
file
or
glob
arg rather than just using the directory/file path as the first unnamed arg
๐Ÿ™Œ 1
๐Ÿ‘Œ 1