Hi. I'm trying to run the bi-directional example with Postman: https://docs.pactflow.io/docs/examples/bi-directional/provider/postman/ I'm trying to go through that example on a Windows WSL2 system. I get as far as trying to execute the command "make test_and_publish" which fails with the following error:

docker run --rm -v //home/someuser/ContractTesting/Bi-Directional/cypress_postman/<example-bi-directional-provider-postman://home/someuser/ContractTesting/Bi-Directional/cypress_postman/example-bi-directional-provider-postman> -w /home/someuser/ContractTesting/Bi-Directional/cypress_postman/example-bi-directional-provider-postman -e PACT_BROKER_BASE_URL -e PACT_BROKER_TOKEN pactfoundation/pact-cli:latest pactflow publish-provider-contract \
      oas/swagger.yml \
      --provider "pactflow-example-bi-directional-provider-postman" \
      --provider-app-version 1b8982-master+1b8982 \
      --branch master \
      --content-type application/yaml \
      --verification-exit-code=0 \
      --verification-results newman/newman-run-report-2022-07-27-06-17-15-353-0.json \
      --verification-results-content-type text/plain\
      --verifier postman
/pact/entrypoint.sh: exec: line 15: pactflow: not found
make[1]: *** [Makefile:57: publish_provider_contract] Error 127
make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/someuser/ContractTesting/Bi-Directional/cypress_postman/example-bi-directional-provider-postman'
make: *** [Makefile:49: test_and_publish] Error 2

Any hints what could be the cause of the problem?

My guess is that it’s not happy with the escaping of the command

Then I get just the following error: /pact/entrypoint.sh: exec: line 15: pactflow: not found

hmmm

Ok, after pulling the latest image that error disappeared, I now get this: No value provided for required options '--provider', '--provider-app-version', '--broker-base-url' So does this mean that the

make test_and_publish

command in the postman example was not pulling the latest docker image?

well, yes I guess so. We could probably force it to do a

pull

Hmmm, in fact I never pulled any docker image myself, so that command must have pulled the first docker image by itself, is that so?

either that, or you’ve previously run other pact examples that use it, and just happened to have a slightly older version

Aha, thats very likely, because I've been indeed running pact examples for some time now in that same environment. So that explains everything. Thanks a lot.