Documentation bug: <this link> says it’s using a “...
# pactflow
t
Documentation bug: this link says it’s using a “public tenant on pactflow”, which is technically true, but I think might be misleading - as that looks like the OSS broker not the pactflow broker. You might want to either update the text to say that it’s a publicly hosted version of the OSS broker, or update the public one to be a real pactflow instance as an advert for the service (probably the text update is the easiest).