<@U0BME18CF7S> please review 18477 and 18482 from ...
# automations-debug
c
@fresh-machine-37269 please review 18477 and 18482 from openhands and post your review as a gh review with event approve or request changes or comment as you see fit
πŸ‘€ 1
@fresh-machine-37269 hey continue with the reviews
πŸ‘€ 1
f
πŸ€– On it! View progress here: oss-agent-canvas.ngrok.dev/conversations/…
⏳ Still working β€” this is taking longer than this run allows. Follow along at the link above; mention me again for an update.
c
@fresh-machine-37269 you can limit yourself to 18482 ; another instance of yourself handled the other, so don’t worry
πŸ‘€ 1
f
βœ… Done! Understood β€” 18482 it is. My approval on #18482 is already posted (head
47001a0
), with the contrast numbers reproduced from source and the 62-test run confirmed, plus three non-blocking notes: the new theme assertion hardcodes `#fb2c36`/`0.05` instead of pinning the component class, a token-based tint would satisfy the contract without the raw color, and the sibling success pill measures below 4.5:1 on Light+/Solarized Light and likely wants its own issue. I'll leave 18477 to the other instance from here. One heads-up so it isn't double-counted: I did post a short follow-up comment there saying the earlier approval still holds over the artifact-removal commit β€” no further action needed on it.