<github.com/OpenHands/automation/issues/542> - <@U...
# proj-automation
q
github.com/OpenHands/automation/issues/542 - @limited-student-10747 proposal for adding a more principled trace layer to automation service; imo this would be a good start for debugging issues with software factory automations
l
High-level question, are we re-inventing something that laminar or mlflow already gives us?
I kinda feel that since we already support telemetry through OTEL we might just want to rely on that
q
Thats a good point, laminar might be a good candidate looking into it
👍 1
l
Do you have access to our account?
q
Yep And seems like users can also configure a local deployment of laminar if they wanted everything to run on a VM github.com/OpenHands/automation/issues/543 Adding OTEL integration as first step to automation BE, then I'll hook our VM to laminar
👍 1
l
Great