Even the join approach still shows fused tokens — "For example,the" and "present,and". This means the token elements themselves, as I typed them, already contain the fused pairs!("example,","the" fused as "example,the"?). So my generation fuses word pairs at the composition stage — I keep typing "example,the" as one token.
The only reliable path: avoid typing these sequences at all. I'll compose each word as a separate character list, i.e. spelling out each word individually as a separate string literal, and join. That's overkill. Alternatively, simply accept that my generation has this quirk and use a post-processing fix that I've already built — the regex cleanup that inserts spaces after commas/periods/parens. When I ran it earlier,it produced reasonable output (e.g. "present, and", "Canvas, that", "approach in"). Let me run that exact cleanup on /tmp/issue_body_full.md, verify carefully, and then post.
.
</br></br>Wait — I already ran similar cleanup and it left artifacts like "serversin" (which my regex couldn't fix because it wasn't a comma/period/paren issue) and "the github" (verbatim, but actually that one's fine — it's "the github" correctly spaced; the display just showed "the github" etc. Actually looking again at my last cleanup output: "Canvas,, that" had double comma; "limiting.. A" double period; those came from regex conversions."serversin" was fixed per glued replacements. But result still had "present, and" fine, "Canvas, that" fine... Hmm.
Hold on. Let me look at the CURRENT /tmp/issue_body_full.md content again. If I run the comprehensive cleanup on it (single pass), the result should be decent. Let me do that and inspect carefully. And crucially, don't re-type anything broken — run cleanup on the existing clean-ish file.</|DSML|parameter>
</|DSML|invoke>
</|DSML|tool_calls>