<@U0BME18CF7S> make a list of competitors of openh...
# automations-debug
m
@fresh-machine-37269 make a list of competitors of openhands
👀 1
f
🤖 On it! View progress here: oss-agent-canvas.ngrok.dev/conversations/…
✅ Done! Here's a list of notable competitors / alternatives to OpenHands in the AI software engineering agent space: Autonomous coding agents • Devin (Cognition) – autonomous AI software engineer • SWE-agent (Princeton) – open-source agent for solving GitHub issues • Aider – open-source AI pair programmer in the terminal • OpenDevin – (now merged into OpenHands, historically a fork) AI coding assistants / copilots • GitHub Copilot (Microsoft/GitHub) – inline code completion & chat • Cursor – AI-first code editor • Windsurf (Codeium) – AI IDE with agent mode • Amazon Q Developer (formerly CodeWhisperer) • Google Gemini Code Assist • Tabnine – AI code completion Agent frameworks & platforms • LangChain / LangGraph – framework for building LLM agents • AutoGPT – autonomous agent framework • CrewAI – multi-agent orchestration • Sema4.ai – enterprise AI agent platform • MetaGPT – multi-agent software company simulation Enterprise / commercial agent platforms • Factory.ai – AI-powered software development platform • Poolside AI – code-generation focused foundation models • Cursor / Anysphere – increasingly building agent capabilities The competitive landscape is moving fast, with the biggest practical rivals being Devin, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, and SWE-agent depending on whether you're comparing on autonomous-agent capability or coding-assistant functionality. Let me know if you'd like a deeper comparison on any of these! ð
c
Ha! The last character is again unexpected
what LLM is it?
m
GLM
but it is really the LLM. Is not me
c
Ooh interesting
It missed those competitors I know best 😅: Cline, opencode, AmpCode and, it listed … OpenDevin (!!)
m
haha
But i believe the answer was done by memory
so possible not anymore up to date the list
c
right, opencode might be sort of new (an year), though the others are older
GLM 5.2 I assume?
Very strange, those characters. I see in a new thread more than one: • accent circonflexe â • and some other I don’t even know how to call it
You're saying it’s the LLM, can you maybe enable telemetry/logging for LLM responses, so we see it right as it comes…? just in case
m
I can look into the traces
nod 1