I created a compatibility matrix for SDK vs agent-...
# proj-agent
w
I created a compatibility matrix for SDK vs agent-server https://artifacts.app.rbren.io/eddacb5e70d549f1bfc70c20a4738521/compatibility-matrix.html Things I'd love to see tackled: • delegation (I think it's v close, Vasco is on it) • critic • multi-LLM / LLM fallback • LLM completions overall seems pretty solid though! Eventually I'm hoping to add CLI/web and maybe typescript-client to the matrix, and have a job that keeps it updated
šŸ‘ 2
m
Do we have a binary release for the agent-server?
Another things that we can add is • LLMProfileStore. Which gives the agent-server the possibility to load and persist LLM profiles across sessions
c
@nutritious-balloon-65098 please create an issue for compatibility for SDK vs agent-server and cite the site that robert shared
n
I'm on it! Xingyao Wang can track my progress here.
## Summary I created a GitHub issue on OpenHands/software-agent-sdk that captures the SDK vs agent-server compatibility gaps, citing Robert's shared compatibility matrix. ### Checklist - āœ… Created issue on the correct repo — [Issue #2725](https://github.com/OpenHands/software-agent-sdk/issues/2725) on
OpenHands/software-agent-sdk
- āœ… Cited Robert's shared site — The issue prominently links to the [compatibility matrix](https://artifacts.app.rbren.io/eddacb5e70d549f1bfc70c20a4738521/compatibility-matrix.html) - āœ… Captured the key gaps Robert highlighted — delegation, critic, multi-LLM/fallback, and LLM completions are called out as high priority - āœ… Included additional context from the conversation — the LLMProfileStore suggestion, the note that Vasco is working on delegation, future plans for CLI/web/TypeScript columns and CI automation, and a reference to PR #2710 - āœ… No extraneous changes — no code changes were made; only the issue was created - āœ… AI disclosure included in the issue body No code changes or commits were involved — this was purely a GitHub issue creation task, and it's fully complete.