I'm assuming theres no harm in publishing our Open...
# proj-documentation
e
I'm assuming theres no harm in publishing our OpenHands Cloud Swagger docs on the Docs site? https://app.all-hands.dev/docs
👍 1
l
what do you mean “posting”? adding a link?
definitely ok to add a link to that site, but i wouldn’t duplicate the docs onto the docs site for instance
e
yes, just adding a link to the Swagger docs
👍 1
c
That's a combined API, V0 and V1, it seems? Are we going to remove V0 from that, or could it mark somehow those that are V0 only?
l
We’re deprecating v0 and removing it by April
c
Yes, but I mean, in the Swagger doc, V0 endpoints are mixed in
Don't we want to avoid people relying on or using it in new applications?
Sorry, a bit of a misunderstanding: some are strikethrough, to show they are deprecated. But I think I see some that are V0 and are not strikethrough. That's the reason why I'm wondering, though I could be wrong
PR to deprecate V0 endpoints, which were defined in files marked `legacy-v0`: but were not deprecated https://github.com/OpenHands/OpenHands/pull/12947 I'm a bit surprised by
/settings
and
/secrets
, now, I wonder if maybe the agent went too far the other way around đŸ˜