idea: move to codeberg, to avoid non compete clauses imposed to github by openai azure and anthropic

codeberg is interesting, but we don’t support codeberg yet. could you elaborate on non-compete clauses?

openai and anthropic say "you can't use our models to make competing ai products", and openhands is a semi-competitor of openai's codex cloud and anthropic's customer devin

Anthropic ToS says

Customer may not and must not attempt to (a) access the Services to build a competing product or service, including to train competing AI models or resell

which is pretty bad IMO, but I'm reading it as about models, and in any case it seems pretty far to relate to GitHub. We are trying to not depend too much on Anthropic, though. I do agree we need options, you never know when these single-point-of-failure proprietary services might pull the rug. These days I'm incredibly happy that we are moving towards optimizing behavior for multiple models - not just using them, which of course it's possible, but making them behave better. 😊 ❤️

@calm-artist-7206 we're also techically competing with claude code and github copilot

I hear you, I just think that clause hasn't been used that way, and it seems difficult to. Frankly, imagine that, their main business I think it's "use Claude for coding tools"? They'd scare off a big market 😅

another thing with github is they don't have IPv6 access: https://github.com/orgs/community/discussions/10539