fedorvdl
09/26/2026, 7:31 PMfedorvdl
09/26/2026, 7:31 PMfedorvdl
09/26/2026, 7:32 PMotaolafr
09/30/2026, 8:47 AMotaolafr
09/30/2026, 8:47 AMYann
10/01/2026, 7:16 AMotaolafr
10/01/2026, 7:51 AMYann
10/05/2026, 7:36 AMYann
10/05/2026, 7:40 AMJPD
10/05/2026, 2:19 PMLookid
10/05/2026, 6:03 PMfinn
10/05/2026, 7:21 PMlennygo
10/05/2026, 7:44 PMlennygo
10/05/2026, 7:44 PMlennygo
10/05/2026, 7:45 PMkandelabr
10/05/2026, 9:15 PMlennygo
10/05/2026, 9:15 PMlennygo
10/05/2026, 9:16 PMkandelabr
10/05/2026, 9:16 PMlennygo
10/05/2026, 9:16 PMlennygo
10/05/2026, 9:17 PMlennygo
10/05/2026, 9:17 PMlennygo
10/05/2026, 9:17 PMkandelabr
10/05/2026, 9:17 PMlennygo
10/05/2026, 9:35 PMotaolafr
10/06/2026, 6:22 AMotaolafr
10/06/2026, 9:52 AMremoved the best_defects > 0 gate in both files — the smoother is keep-best by construction, so this can only help or leave the mesh unchanged. Measured on the cylinder (real checkMesh): max non-orthogonality 51.3° → 41.7° (-19%), max skewness 1.53 → 1.28 (-16%). Aspect ratio essentially unchanged (4.43 → 4.46) — snappyHexMesh still wins on all three metrics, this closes PART of the gap, not all of it.
so:
aspect ratio 3.02 vs 4.46, max non-orthogonality 29.1° vs 41.7°, max skewness 0.86 vs 1.28
would be curious how it behaves witht he tkeskita smoother.lennygo
10/06/2026, 4:32 PMotaolafr
10/06/2026, 5:10 PMlennygo
10/06/2026, 5:18 PM