How would people feel about adding a single line license header for the nf-core code to the top of all module/subworkflow

<http://main.nf|main.nf>

?? To make it clear that even if someone makes a non-nf-core pipeline using the template (that may have a different license), that even if the rest of the code/local modules have a different license, the official nf-core/subworklow ones remain MIT?

do you mean that the license line in the meta.yml of nf-core modules is not sufficient? When for example they copy just the main.nf?

The license line in a meta.yml is for the tool, not the module code, no?

Sounds good to me.

Can I have a badger @Mahesh Binzer-Panchal?

I'm missing context. I have no idea what that means, so you get a 🦡 emoji

If you agree add the badgerbadger on the other message (but I appreciate the rat looking badger on my phone)

other message?

Thanks!

I see you ran the autoformatter on everything 🙏🙏🙏

Was it on everything??

Oh, maybe

Like we SHOULD do that anyway

Looks pretty thorough anyway

(in b4 Simon says but I want pure harshil alignment!)