Anyone want to help <@U0948RQHS2J> name the GRIDSS...
# subworkflows
s
Anyone want to help @Sarath Murugan name the GRIDSS subworkflow in github.com/nf-core/modules/pull/12574 I feel that
bam_tumor_normal_somatic_structural_variant_calling_gridss
is a bit excessive
m
I’m feeling like naming stuff is getting to be 90% of the work around here 😅 Can’t we make a bot for that?
🤣 2
IMO, I’d drop the
tumor_normal
s
I was thinking the same.
somatic
and `tumor_normal`basically mean the same thing here.
One more thing, is it okay to use
sv
instead of
structural_variant
? The final subworkflow name would be
bam_somatic_sv_calling_gridss
m
You could maybe even omit the
variant_calling
part, as that’s indicated by
gridss
s
True, but we still need to specify the action itself in the name. I'd rather keep the variant calling part so it's clear what GRIDSS is doing, but shorten it to
sv_calling
so it doesn't get too long.
a
I like
sv_calling
m
me too!
s
Perfect ! Shall we lock in
bam_somatic_sv_calling_gridss
as the final name ?
👍🏻 1
👍 1
s
Good for me
✅ 1
s
Great !