A community effort to collect a curated set of analysis pipelines built using Nextflow.

nf-core

Here is a PR which implements coverage tracks, for review: <https://github.com/nf-core/riboseq/pull/144/>

Coverage tracks for Ribo-Seq have pretty limited interpretability. Would it be very challenging to produce A or P site tracks instead (or maybe as well)?

P-site tracks are already generated by Plastid. I can probably expand this to A-site as well.

Would you think it is better to remove the coverage tracks for the Ribo-seq samples and only produce ones for RNA-seq?

Ah, my bad! Adding coverage on top of those tracks makes sense then for a higher level view.

Having coverage is no harm if we already have P-sites