<https://github.com/nf-core/proposals/issues/134> ...
# team-maintainers
i
https://github.com/nf-core/proposals/issues/134 Can we get some opinions here? The rationale is strong, but I get an uncanny vallley feeling about the workflow design (feels like overlap, but I can't find a really similar pipeline)
j
Maybe this?
Which is still coming by the looks ofit : https://github.com/PlasmoGenEpi/plasmodiumdrugres
i
The biological context is indeed similar, but the pipeline design differs (in that #C08AL3N8R5Y starts with an allele table, while the proposal would start with reads). I don't see enough info about the final steps to know whether there is an overlap.
j
Yeah definitely not hte sam pipeline as drugrs
l
I agree with @James Fellows Yates comment, we shouldn't have specie specific pipeline. There is many arrows in the diagram with no explanation, so I'm not sure what they meant.
j
To be clear: I don't necessary mean to exclude species specific pipelines! But there needs to be a clear reason why it needs to be species specific, because as you say the current proposal is not clear
l
Sorry for the over-interpretation 😅 I agree, from the look of the tools they propose, I don't think this should be malaria specific. The diagram, is a bit weird 🤔
100 rainbow 1