Has there been any changes to the way conda is ins...
# infrastructurej
James Fellows Yates
04/15/2026, 6:54 AMHas there been any changes to the way conda is installed on test GitHub actions test runners?
m
Maxime Garcia
04/15/2026, 7:58 AMI have a fix for this
Maxime Garcia
04/15/2026, 7:58 AMI spoke with @mashehu about it already
Maxime Garcia
04/15/2026, 7:59 AMGive 1h, as I have some training
Maxime Garcia
04/15/2026, 7:59 AMm
mashehu
04/15/2026, 8:02 AMwe have that already in the action https://github.com/nf-core/taxprofiler/actions/runs/24440425217/job/71404001756?pr=721#step:4:480
mashehu
04/15/2026, 8:03 AMnot sure what is happening there, because it later says, that it is not present, but then comes up again. nothing changed on the base images as far as i can see
j
James Fellows Yates
04/15/2026, 8:31 AMOK, but otherwise nothing to worry about then (cc @Sofia Stamouli)
s
Sofia Stamouli
04/15/2026, 8:32 AMGreat, thank you!
m
Maxime Garcia
04/15/2026, 8:55 AMI would still add bioconda there: https://github.com/nf-core/taxprofiler/blob/dev/.github/actions/nf-test/action.yml#L55
Maxime Garcia
04/15/2026, 8:56 AMBut it's just a warning, so as long as you're not doing any over the top thing like us in #CGFUX04HZ and capturing the warnings, you should be fine
Maxime Garcia
04/15/2026, 8:59 AMI do think this whole check needs to be rewritten anyway, since we expect bioconda
2 Views