Do we have a plan around what I would argue are fa...
# infrastructure
j
Do we have a plan around what I would argue are false positive linting errors for `utils_nfcore_taxprofiler_pipeline`: These bother me because 'they are not my fault' so-to-say 😬 . Could we explicitly exlcude
utils_nfcore_*_pipeline
from subworkflows linting, or should we at least add a
meta.yml
?
➕ 1
m
oops. please make an issue
👍 1
j
Which solution would you prefer?
m
or it should be fixed in the next releae, once we assume topics as default
j
I assumed the versions warnings would naturally disappear after the transition
m
ah, you mean
meta_yml_exists
?
j
But the
meta.yaml
one annoys me the most
m
we should have a meta.yml imo
👍 1
j
OK, but I guess we need to check linting works on it... I had problems earlier of linting getting confused between local subworkflkow and module naming
m
btw. did you test with the latest dev version of tools, just to make sure we haven't already fixed this 🙂
j
No not yet, but at least I didn't see
meta.yml
in teh template
(Should I merge the docs v2 links PR btw, one unrelated failing test: https://github.com/nf-core/tools/pull/4135#issuecomment-4161082610)
btw. did you test with the latest dev version of tools, just to make sure we haven't already fixed this
just checked, and same results as stable
m
thanks