A small update on my previous message about the Er...
# sarek
k
A small update on my previous message about the Error: https://nfcore.slack.com/archives/CGFUX04HZ/p1773782404493829 I don't see this error when I use STRELKA, but I do with MUTECT2. I'm using the 3.8.1 version. Should I downgrade the version?
Also tried downgrading the version to 3.8.0 and I still have the same error
m
OK, that's bad news, I'll try to see what could have gone wrong here
k
Hi Maxime...Thank you for the message. Small update. As mentioned in this GitHub post https://github.com/nf-core/sarek/issues/1455 I included that piece of block in the config file I'm using and there is no Error now. Completed successfully.
[77/b9cefa] NFC…(1228468_D1_vs_1223221_D1) | 1 of 1 ✔
[29/74c16c] NFC…(1228468_D1_vs_1223221_D1) | 1 of 1 ✔
[05/9fb27a] NFC…(1228468_D1_vs_1223221_D1) | 1 of 1 ✔
[d6/af6d0e] NFC…(1228468_D1_vs_1223221_D1) | 21 of 21 ✔
[34/fc7298] NFC…(1228468_D1_vs_1223221_D1) | 1 of 1 ✔
[18/9a4fa9] NFC…(1228468_D1_vs_1223221_D1) | 1 of 1 ✔
[65/a3d07d] NFC…(1228468_D1_vs_1223221_D1) | 21 of 21 ✔
[ab/a06f39] NFC…(1228468_D1_vs_1223221_D1) | 1 of 1 ✔
[88/316f68] NFC…(1228468_D1_vs_1223221_D1) | 1 of 1 ✔
[9a/3a4a10] NFC…(1228468_D1_vs_1223221_D1) | 1 of 1 ✔
[20/0971cb] NFC…MARIES_NORMAL (1223221_D1) | 21 of 21 ✔
[7b/5dbef0] NFC…MMARIES_TUMOR (1228468_D1) | 21 of 21 ✔
[32/a193b9] NFC…MARIES_NORMAL (1223221_D1) | 1 of 1 ✔
[2f/1c28d8] NFC…MMARIES_TUMOR (1228468_D1) | 1 of 1 ✔
[b2/ce07c1] NFC…(1228468_D1_vs_1223221_D1) | 1 of 1 ✔
[29/e15817] NFC…(1228468_D1_vs_1223221_D1) | 1 of 1 ✔
[e8/450614] NFC…(1228468_D1_vs_1223221_D1) | 4 of 4 ✔
[1f/2f7822] NFC…(1228468_D1_vs_1223221_D1) | 4 of 4 ✔
[32/5bcd5f] NFC…(1228468_D1_vs_1223221_D1) | 4 of 4 ✔
[a0/ceba3a] NFC…(1228468_D1_vs_1223221_D1) | 4 of 4 ✔
[c8/da4d1f] NFCORE_SAREK:sarek:MULTIQC     | 1 of 1 ✔
Plus 9 more processes waiting for tasks…
-[nf-core/sarek] Pipeline completed successfully-
Completed at: 19-Mar-2026 20:36:17
Duration    : 7h 10m 50s
CPU hours   : 405.8 (1.4% failed)
Succeeded   : 172
Failed      : 1
The failed task is just the SLURM timeout.
🙏 1
👍🏾 1
t
Glad you solved the issue, good work! Some general comments: • The
sex
column in the samplesheet should either be left out or set to
ZZ
if you don't know the correct value (
XX
or
XY
),
NA
is not valid. Not sure if this would cause an error in some tools. • 32 GB and 8 cores is overkill for
nextflow
itself, 8 GB and 1-2 cores should be plenty. This would cause any errors, though, just wasted resources.
👍 1
m
For now only control freec and ascat use the sex, and indeed I believe they only allow for XY or XX
👍 1
k
Sure. Thank you. BTW, I have answered the issue I created https://github.com/nf-core/sarek/issues/2156