<@UQZG2UCF3> while you're looking at workflow outp...
# infrastructure
m
@mashehu while you're looking at workflow output, we can mix and match with publishDir
confused dog 1
m
yes, but I don't know what you mean with "mix and match with publishDir"
m
we can mix and match old publishDir syntax with new workflow output syntax
so no need to migrate ALL at once
as I know it can be a pain
and why I am trying to push for a multiqc_files topic
But anyhow, just migrating the files produced by MultiQC is easy enough and can go a long way into helping people start using the workflow output if we want to go down this way now
j
Yeah we should make sure we support both
👍🏻 1
It will be a huge thing to port over everything in one go
m
ok, so you want another PR to amend TEMPLATE ❤️ ?
Already in use in multiple pipelines
because in my opinion 3798 is useless without at least some output published via workflow output
👍🏻 1
@mashehu @Júlia Mir should I add workflow output for multiQC in this PR or in another
m
in another one please
m
ok
in that one you're still missing this fallback for nf-test
And here we have workflow output for multiQC, while we keep publishDir for FASTQC: https://github.com/nf-core/tools/pull/4093