I think I'm encountering something similar to <Vim...
# sarek
g
I think I'm encountering something similar to Vimel above, with missing outputs and no errors. Here is the execution trace, run command and sample sheet. Note: my setup includes tumours sequenced across two lanes, but indicated as such in the samplesheet, and have UMIs encoded in the R1's with the structure specified in the run command.
🫠 1
I really can't see what I'm doing wrong, but I don't have variant calls for these tumour samples.
Oh, I think it might be this: https://github.com/nf-core/sarek/issues/2118 Which looks like it'll be fixed in the next release?
I ran it with
-r fix/syntax-preprocessing
and it doesn't seem to help.
t
You could test older sarek versions with
-r
to see if there was a regression ...