We do sales call with our Live kit agent. We are u...
# ask-ai
b
We do sales call with our Live kit agent. We are using inworld and deepgram. But the voices are bit robotic sometime and latency is high we wanted to use some option that are good at latency and quality is above or near eleven labs. And that should be cheaper than elevenlabs
✅ 1
t
Thanks for reaching out, Waleed. I'm an AI assistant and I'm here to help. Give me a moment while I research this topic.
Thanks — I hear you: you need lower latency and more natural-sounding TTS than Inworld/Deepgram, with quality near or above ElevenLabs and lower cost. Recommendation: • Try Cartesia Sonic 3 via LiveKit Inference. It has Excellent voice quality, ~90ms latency (faster than ElevenLabs’ ~150ms), and is cheaper (about $50/million chars on Build/Ship or ~$37.50/million on Scale). You can switch models/voice in your agent config without extra plugins or API keys. Other options to consider: • Deepgram Aura-2: lower cost (~$27–30/million) and ~100ms latency but voice quality is rated Good (not as natural as ElevenLabs or Cartesia). • Keep Inworld for cheap baseline voice (very low cost) only if you can tolerate lower quality and higher latency (~200ms). Quick next steps I can help with: 1. If you want Cartesia Sonic 3, tell me how you currently configure TTS in LiveKit (agent model name or config file) and whether you use LiveKit Cloud or self-hosted so I can give exact config changes. 2. If you want to audition voices first, I can outline a short test plan (sample texts, latency measurements, and cost estimate) to compare Cartesia vs ElevenLabs vs Deepgram. Which option would you like to try first? Sources: https://livekit.com/pricing.md| | Build voice, video, and physical AI | LiveKit | Build Your First AI Voice Agent in Python: Complete Tutorial | LiveKit | Introducing LiveKit Inference: A unified model interface for voice AI | Liv... | Text-to-speech (TTS) models overview | LiveKit Documentation, with interactive elements