Thanks — I’m responding to your question about which Agents framework is more performant: Python or JavaScript/TypeScript. Short answer • There are no performance benchmarks in the available sources, so I can’t definitively say one is faster than the other. • However, the Python Agents framework is more mature and production-ready, while the JavaScript/TypeScript framework is still in beta. For reliability and production use, Python is the recommended choice. What the sources say (concise) • Python: stable (v1.0+), production-ready, 40+ plugins, built-in retry/fallback behavior — recommended for production-grade agents. • JavaScript/TypeScript: beta, fewer plugins, retry logic not fully implemented — intended for experimentation and early testing. How to pick for your use case • If you need production stability, built-in reliability features, and a mature plugin ecosystem: choose Python. • If you need to prototype quickly in a Node environment or must integrate tightly with existing JS/TS code and can accept missing features and extra development effort: consider JS/TS (but expect more work to reach production parity). If you want, I can help with: • Listing specific production features the Python framework provides that affect reliability (retries, fallbacks, plugins). • Helping you design a simple benchmark plan to compare latency and resource usage for your specific workload (what traffic, message sizes, and environment you care about). • Outlining what’s missing in the JS/TS beta so you can estimate the engineering work to reach parity. Which of those would be most useful for you? Sources: Agents (Python) | livekit/livekit_composite | DeepWiki | Agents Framework | livekit/livekit_composite | DeepWiki | How to Get Help from LiveKit