quick-cartoon-22764
03/10/2026, 8:16 PMtall-airline-16756
03/10/2026, 8:16 PMtall-airline-16756
03/10/2026, 8:17 PMsession.say(...)) to synthesize and play the fixed introduction immediately. This bypasses LLM inference entirely and removes that delay.
• Example behavior:
◦ Play the pre-recorded or TTS-generated intro immediately on session start.
◦ After the intro completes, route to your normal LLM-driven conversation flow.
Implementation tip
1. Use session.say() (or your equivalent TTS call) for the fixed intro text.
◦ Set allow_interruptions=False if you want the intro to play to completion without being cut off.
1. After session.say() finishes, begin normal STT → LLM → TTS logic for dynamic responses.
Other latency-reduction options to consider
• Pre-generate and cache the intro audio:
◦ If you prefer a specific voice or higher-quality audio, synthesize the intro once and store the audio file. Play the stored audio instantly instead of calling TTS at runtime.
• Preemptive generation for follow-ups:
◦ Enable preemptive generation for the LLM so it can start producing a response while the user is still speaking, reducing perceived reply time once VAD detects end-of-speech.
• Co-locate services / reduce network hops:
◦ Run your agent close to (same region / data center) your STT/TTS/LLM providers to reduce network latency.
• Provisioned inference capacity:
◦ Use provisioned inference resources where available (to avoid queuing and cold starts) for your dynamic LLM calls.
• Monitor metrics:
◦ Track Time To First Token / Time To First Byte and STT/TTS timings to identify whether the bottleneck is network, LLM warmup, STT latency, or TTS rendering.
Decision flow summary (simple)
1. Static intro → Use session.say() or play cached audio.
2. After intro → Start normal LLM-driven flow (consider preemptive_generation).
3. If dynamic introduction is needed later → consider short, cached prompts or small local rule-based responses to avoid full LLM calls.
If you want, I can:
• Show a small code snippet for your runtime language (Python / Node) to integrate session.say() and then start the LLM flow.
• Help you decide between TTS-on-demand vs cached audio based on your voice/quality needs.
Which would you prefer: a code snippet for Python or Node, or help picking between cached audio vs on-the-fly TTS?
Sources: Agent speech and audio | LiveKit Documentation | examples/drive-thru | livekit/livekit_composite | DeepWiki | Introducing LiveKit Inference: A unified model interface for voice AI | LLM Metrics | LiveKit Documentation | How can I reduce latency in voice agents using STT, TTS and LLM? | LiveKitquick-cartoon-22764
03/10/2026, 8:24 PMtall-airline-16756
03/10/2026, 8:24 PMsession.say() or cached audio.
◦ If probe elicits IVR-like responses or DTMF or no human response within a short window, skip the intro.
1. If you expect many false positives/negatives, add a classifier step (server-side) to examine a few seconds of audio and return a machine/human score before intro playback.
Implementation notes and tips
• Use cached audio for the intro (pre-synthesized file) so playback is instantaneous once you decide to play.
• Keep probe audio short and neutral to avoid interacting with IVR menus.
• Tune detection timeouts to balance speed and accuracy. A 1–2 second decision window often works well.
• Log decisions and false-positive cases so you can iteratively improve heuristics and thresholds.
• Consider legal/regulatory constraints for playing automated messages — ensure probes follow local laws.
If you’d like, I can:
• Provide a compact code example (Python or Node) showing a flow that:
1) Listens for a few seconds, 2) Runs VAD/DTMF checks, 3) Plays a probe, 4) Decides whether to play the cached intro.
• Help pick thresholds or a small ML classifier approach if you want higher accuracy.
Which would help more: a code snippet in Python or Node, or a sample decision flow with recommended thresholds?