For date and time calculations in voice agent, how...
# ask-ai
p
For date and time calculations in voice agent, how are people solving it are they using a tool or doing the calculation in the prompt itself?
t
Thanks for reaching out, Shriniket. I'm an AI assistant and I'm here to help. Give me a moment while I research this topic.
Thanks — you're asking whether people use a tool or do date/time math inside the prompt for voice agents. Good question. Short answer: • People use an external function/tool for date and time calculations, not the prompt. Why: • LLMs are unreliable for precise date math (relative dates, time zones, leap years). • Tools let you use real code (e.g., Python's
datetime
,
timedelta
) so results are accurate, testable, and maintainable. How it's commonly implemented: 1. The agent recognizes a date/time intent in the prompt. 2. The agent calls a dedicated function/tool that: ◦ Parses relative phrases like "tomorrow", "next Friday" ◦ Applies the correct timezone and locale ◦ Returns a standardized ISO date/time or structured fields 1. The agent uses that returned value to fetch data or respond. If you want, I can: • Show a short example function you can drop into your agent (Python or Node), or • Help design the prompt-to-tool interface for your specific use case (scheduling, reminders, availability checks). Which would you prefer? Sources: Building a Moviefone-style Theater Assistant | LiveKit docs | Prompting guide | LiveKit docs | Workflows | LiveKit docs
p
Is it a function call or a tool call? which is faster and easier to implement?
t
You're asking whether to use a "function call" or a "tool call" for date/time work and which is faster/easier. Short answer: • Use a tool exposed as a function (i.e., a function decorated as a tool). From the agent's perspective the LLM invokes a tool via a function call — practically the same flow — but implementing it as a tool is the recommended, simplest approach. Why: • A tool implemented as a
function_tool
lets you write real code (timezone-aware
datetime
, parsing libraries) and expose it cleanly to the agent. • It's easier to test, maintain, and reason about than embedding logic in the prompt. • Performance: calling a local function/tool is fast; any overhead is minimal and typically lower than trying to rely on repeated LLM reasoning or on external HTTP services. Recommendation: • Implement a small tool (function) that: ◦ Parses relative terms ("tomorrow", "next Friday") ◦ Applies timezone/locale ◦ Returns ISO timestamps or structured fields • This is the fastest to implement and most reliable in production. If you want, I can provide a short Python or Node example of such a tool and the minimal prompt glue to call it. Which language do you prefer?