Thanks — you're asking whether the WhatsApp Connector is officially released and reliable for your setup. I don’t have the release status for the WhatsApp Connector here. To answer correctly I need one quick detail: • Do you mean LiveKit's WhatsApp Connector specifically, or a third‑party integration you’re planning to use with LiveKit? Also, tell me if reliability means: • production‑ready SLA/uptime, • feature completeness (message types, templates, media), • or operational details (scaling, retries, webhooks, failover). With that I’ll give a clear recommendation and next steps.

Thanks — and thanks for confirming you mean LiveKit’s WhatsApp Connector. I don’t have the connector’s release/status here. To give a clear recommendation on whether it’s production‑reliable for your setup, please tell me: • What “reliable” means for you (pick any): SLA/uptime target, expected message volume (messages/min or concurrent sessions), required message types (templates, media, interactive), latency limits, or compliance needs (PCI/HIPAA/data residency). • Are you self‑hosting LiveKit or using LiveKit Cloud? • Regions/locations you’ll serve and your infra (k8s, Docker, managed). • Do you need HA/autoscaling, retries/backpressure, and what monitoring/alerting you require? • Timeline for production rollout (pilot/canary date). • Any mandatory third‑party BSPs, CRMs, or security constraints (IP allowlist, key rotation). With those details I’ll recommend whether the connector fits your scenario and list architecture and mitigation options — or escalate for an official release/SLA confirmation if you need contractual assurance.

Thanks — you asked if you can deploy LiveKit’s WhatsApp Connector. I don’t have confirmation here that the WhatsApp Connector is released or available to deploy. To give a practical next step, could you tell me: • Do you plan to self‑host or use LiveKit Cloud? • Your deployment environment (Kubernetes, Docker Compose, VM, etc.). • Your timeline (pilot vs production) and required scale (messages/min or concurrent sessions). With that I’ll either provide deployment guidance if it’s available for your environment or outline options and mitigations (pilot approach, alternatives) while I confirm the connector’s release status.

Thanks — you want the minimal requirements to run a test of LiveKit’s WhatsApp Connector. I don’t have the connector’s docs here, so I’ll give a concise, environment‑agnostic checklist of what I need from you and the minimum items you’ll need to run a basic end‑to‑end functional test (send/receive). Please confirm/provide: • Hosting: self‑host (Kubernetes, Docker/VM) or LiveKit Cloud? • WhatsApp provider: Meta Business API direct or BSP (name: Twilio/360dialog/MessageBird/etc.)? • Do you already have a provisioned WhatsApp Business number? (yes/no) • Can you expose a public HTTPS webhook (public domain with TLS or ngrok)? (yes/no) • Preferred test scope: simple send/receive only, or include templates/media/interactives? Minimal requirements to test send/receive: • WhatsApp account & phone number (Meta Business or BSP trial that provides a number). • API credentials from your BSP or Meta (API key, token, or client credentials). • Public HTTPS endpoint for webhooks (valid TLS). ngrok is acceptable for quick tests. • A host to run the connector (container or pod) with outbound HTTPS allowed. • Basic config file or environment variables with BSP credentials + webhook URL. • A test WhatsApp client (phone) to send/receive messages. • Logs/console access to see connector activity and webhook deliveries. If you want a step‑by‑step minimal test checklist now, say “give minimal test checklist” and I’ll return a short deploy + test sequence tailored to your hosting choice.