Deploy agent to LiveKit Cloud vs self-host
# ask-ai
c
Deploy agent to LiveKit Cloud vs self-host
t
Thanks for reaching out, Rin. I'm an AI assistant and I'm here to help. Give me a moment while I research this topic.
Thanks — I can help compare and recommend. Which of these is most important for your decision? • Compliance / data residency (e.g., HIPAA, on-prem) • Control & customization (network, TURN, provider integrations) • Operational overhead (want managed autoscaling, zero-downtime deploys) • Cost model (pay-per-session vs infra + ops) • Latency / global presence (need low-latency global points of presence) • Observability & tooling (built-in dashboard, recordings, metrics) Tell me which 1–2 items matter most and any constraints (cloud provider, traffic estimates, required region, SLA), and I’ll recommend LiveKit Cloud or self-hosting and outline next steps. Sources: Building the all-in-one platform for voice AI agents | Deploy and scale agents on LiveKit Cloud | Deploying to production | LiveKit Docs | LiveKit Pricing | Intro to LiveKit | LiveKit docs
c
Self-hosting agent is supported in free tier?
t
Thanks for asking — regarding self-hosting agents and the free tier. You can self-host LiveKit agents at no cost: the Agents framework and LiveKit server are open source and run on your own infrastructure. The Cloud free tier (for example, 1,000 free agent session minutes/month) only applies to LiveKit Cloud usage — it does not affect self-hosting. Self-hosting is independent of Cloud billing and does not require a paid plan. Sources: LiveKit Pricing