hi

Thanks for reaching out, Pavan. I'm an AI assistant and I'm here to help. Give me a moment while I research this topic.

def on_user_state_changed(event): if event.new_state == "away": async def check_and_close(): await session.generate_reply(instructions="confirming user are still there") # Set up monitoring for state changes call_should_end = True def on_state_change(state_event): nonlocal call_should_end if state_event.new_state in ["speaking", "listening"]: call_should_end = False # Temporarily listen for state changes session.on("user_state_changed", on_state_change) # Wait for potential response await asyncio.sleep(4) # Remove temporary listener session.off("user_state_changed", on_state_change) # Only end call if user didn't become active again if call_should_end: await session.generate_reply(instructions="I am turning off this call, thank you") await session.aclose() try: request = api.DeleteRoomRequest(room=ctx.room.name) await ctx.api.room.delete_room(request) except Exception as e: print(f"Warning: Failed to delete room: {e}") asyncio.create_task(check_and_close()) session.on("user_state_changed", on_user_state_changed) check this code it is not working correctly

Thanks — I looked at the snippet you pasted. I can help debug it, but I need a couple quick clarifications first so I don't guess. 1. What error or incorrect behavior do you see? (exceptions, logs, nothing happens, task never runs, room not deleted, etc.) 2. What runtime/SDK are you using (Python version, asyncio loop type, LiveKit SDK or custom session wrapper)? 3. Is

session.generate_reply

and

session.aclose()

async functions that work when called elsewhere? 4. Is this code running inside a coroutine already, or at top level of a module? (Are you seeing "nonlocal" scope errors?) 5. Can you share the exact indentation/formatting of the original file (the pasted code lost indentation and backslashes)? While you gather that, a few likely problem areas to check: • Indentation and correct use of

nonlocal

—

nonlocal call_should_end

must be inside a nested function where

call_should_end

is defined in the enclosing scope. • Registering/removing listeners — ensure

session.on

and

session.off

accept the same handler identity. • Ensure

asyncio.create_task(check_and_close())

runs on the same event loop as your session callbacks. • Confirm

session.generate_reply

and

session.aclose()

don't block or raise when called from the task. • Wrap API calls in try/except (you already do for delete_room) and log exceptions so failures aren't silent. Tell me the answers to 1–4 (or paste exact error text), and paste the original file with proper indentation; I’ll propose a corrected version.

cal is getting end after user say somthing

Thanks — I’m here to help. I’m responding to "call is getting end after user say somthing" (call ends prematurely after the user speaks). A few targeted questions so I can pinpoint the bug: 1. When the user speaks, does the call end immediately or after ~4 seconds? 2. Do you see any exceptions or logs when the call ends? If yes, paste them. 3. Is the pasted handler running inside an existing coroutine scope (i.e., are you already inside an async function when you register

session.on

)? 4. Does

on_state_change

run when the user speaks? Add a quick log/print in it and tell me the output. 5. Does

session.off("user_state_changed", on_state_change)

actually remove the listener in your environment (do you know if

session.off

requires the same function object)? 6. Can you confirm

session.generate_reply

and

session.aclose()

are reliable when called from a background task (they work when called elsewhere)? 7. Please paste the original file with correct indentation (or the minimal runnable example) so I can propose a fixed version. If you want, I can suggest a safe corrected pattern next (using an Event or timestamp check) once you confirm answers 1–4 or paste the properly indented code. Which would you prefer?

is my logic is correct for this

You're asking if the logic is correct for "end the call when user goes away unless they become active again within 4s." Short answer: the high-level idea is fine, but the snippet has likely bugs (scope/indentation, listener removal, and race with event loop) that make it end calls unexpectedly when the user speaks. I can help fix it — a few quick checks first: 1. When the user speaks, does the call end immediately or after ~4s? 2. Do you see any exceptions or prints from your handlers? 3. Are

session.generate_reply

and

session.aclose()

async functions that work elsewhere? 4. Paste the exact file (with real indentation) or confirm this is running inside an async context. If you want, paste the properly indented snippet now and I’ll provide a corrected implementation (uses an Event/timestamp, keeps handler references so

off()

works, and logs errors). Which do you prefer? Sources: Company directory phone assistant | LiveKit docs

immitieatly call get end

Thanks — you're saying the call ends immediately after the user speaks. That means the inactivity-close path is running before the temporary listener can reset the flag. Your logic goal is fine, but the current snippet likely has one of these bugs: •

nonlocal call_should_end

not placed correctly so

on_state_change

doesn't update the outer variable. • The temporary listener isn't the same function object when removing (so

session.off

fails). • The background task runs on a different loop or races with the event handler (so speaking doesn't reset the flag in time). • Silent exceptions in

check_and_close()

causing immediate cleanup. I can provide a corrected pattern. Before that, which do you want: 1) Paste your exact, properly indented file and I’ll patch it in-place. 2) I’ll give a minimal, fixed example now (uses an Event/timestamp, keeps handler refs, logs errors). Pick 1 or 2. Sources: Agents v0.x migration guide - Python | LiveKit docs | Agents Framework | livekit/livekit_composite | DeepWiki | How to detect and handle silence during calls | examples/voice_agents | livekit/livekit_composite | DeepWiki | Job lifecycle | LiveKit docs

{"message": "Error in _realtime_reply_task\nTraceback (most recent call last):\n File \"/usr/local/lib/python3.11/site-packages/livekit/agents/utils/log.py\", line 16, in async_fn_logs\n return await fn(*args, **kwargs)\n ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^\n File \"/usr/local/lib/python3.11/site-packages/livekit/agents/voice/agent_activity.py\", line 2185, in _realtime_reply_task\n generation_ev = await self._rt_session.generate_reply(\n ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^\nlivekit.agents.llm.realtime.RealtimeError: generate_reply timed out waiting for generation_created event.", "level": "ERROR", "name": "livekit.agents", "exc_info": "Traceback (most recent call last):\n File \"/usr/local/lib/python3.11/site-packages/livekit/agents/utils/log.py\", line 16, in async_fn_logs\n return await fn(*args, **kwargs)\n ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^\n File \"/usr/local/lib/python3.11/site-packages/livekit/agents/voice/agent_activity.py\", line 2185, in _realtime_reply_task\n generation_ev = await self._rt_session.generate_reply(\n ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^\nlivekit.agents.llm.realtime.RealtimeError: generate_reply timed out waiting for generation_created event.", "pid": 26, "job_id": "AJ_jBk872METqmN", "room_id": "RM_tM9ogciKNi2k", "timestamp": "2025-12-

Thanks — you're seeing two linked issues: the Realtime

generate_reply

timeout and the call ending immediately after the user speaks. I'll address both and give a concise, safe fix you can try. Why this is happening (short): • The Realtime error means the LLM reply generation never produced the expected

generation_created

event, so

generate_reply

timed out. When that fails, your task may cancel or hit an exception path that triggers cleanup/disconnect. • Your inactivity logic also likely has a race or scope bug: the flag/timestamp meant to prevent closing isn't being updated in time (or listener removal fails), so the monitor thinks the user is inactive and ends the call immediately when speech happens. What to do now — two changes to make together: 1) Make generate_reply robust • Wrap

generate_reply

in try/except and add retry/fallback behavior. Log failures and avoid calling room-close on transient LLM errors. Example pattern:

try:
    await session.generate_reply(instructions=...)
except Exception as e:
    logger.warning("generate_reply failed, will retry: %s", e)
    # optional retry or fallback; do NOT trigger call shutdown here

2) Replace your flag-based short-lived listener with a timestamp+monitor pattern (avoids nonlocal/handler identity issues) • Maintain a

last_active = time.time()

updated whenever user becomes active. • Run a background task that checks elapsed time and only disconnects after threshold exceeded. • Ensure the event handler that updates

last_active

is the same function object you register/unregister and that you log inside it to confirm it runs. Minimal corrected structure:

import asyncio, time, logging
SILENCE_THRESHOLD = 4.0
CHECK_INTERVAL = 0.5
logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)

last_active = time.time()

def on_user_state_changed(ev):
    global last_active
    <http://logger.info|logger.info>("user_state_changed %s -> %s", ev.old_state, ev.new_state)
    if ev.new_state in ("speaking", "listening"):
        last_active = time.time()

session.on("user_state_changed", on_user_state_changed)

async def monitor_and_close():
    try:
        while True:
            await asyncio.sleep(CHECK_INTERVAL)
            if time.time() - last_active >= SILENCE_THRESHOLD:
                <http://logger.info|logger.info>("Inactivity threshold reached, ending call")
                try:
                    await session.generate_reply(instructions="I am turning off this call, thank you")
                except Exception as e:
                    logger.warning("generate_reply failed during shutdown: %s", e)
                try:
                    await session.aclose()
                except Exception as e:
                    logger.warning("aclose failed: %s", e)
                break
    finally:
        session.off("user_state_changed", on_user_state_changed)

asyncio.create_task(monitor_and_close())

Quick checks to verify after applying: • Add logs in

on_user_state_changed

and in the monitor loop to confirm

last_active

updates and the monitor sees the new timestamp. • Confirm

session.off("user_state_changed", on_user_state_changed)

actually removes the same function object. • Confirm

generate_reply

works elsewhere; if it times out, add retries or use a fallback LLM adapter. If you want, paste the exact indented file (especially the parts around

generate_reply

and the state listener) and I’ll point to the precise lines to change. Which would you prefer? Sources: Avoiding Room ID Reuse When Re-Creating Rooms With the Same Name | examples/voice_agents | livekit/livekit_composite | DeepWiki | Realtime model plugins | LiveKit Docs | Events and error handling | LiveKit docs | examples/frontdesk | livekit/livekit_composite | DeepWiki