Just out of curiosity, for a telephony assistant w...
# ask-ai
p
Just out of curiosity, for a telephony assistant where we need to access large amounts of data and latency is critical, would it be more feasible to use a RAG-based approach or a fine-tuned model?
t
Thanks for reaching out, Mamlesh. I'm an AI assistant and I'm here to help. Give me a moment while I research this topic.
For a telephony assistant where latency is critical and large data access is required, the choice between a RAG-based approach and a fine-tuned model depends on specific needs: • RAG-Based Approach: Ideal for accessing large, dynamic datasets. It allows real-time data retrieval but introduces additional latency due to the lookup process. Optimizations like caching and efficient vector searches can help mitigate delays. • Fine-Tuned Model: Provides faster responses as it doesn't rely on external lookups, making it better for low-latency applications. However, it may struggle with very large datasets and requires retraining to incorporate new data. If the dataset is too large to embed but latency is critical, a hybrid approach could be effective. This would involve using a fine-tuned model for common queries and RAG for less frequent, data-intensive requests. Sources: Agent Testing & Evaluation | livekit/livekit_composite | DeepWiki | External data and RAG | LiveKit Docs