This message was deleted.

identity

should be unique (like a session id or some other uid), there is a separate

name

field which can encode a user’s display name.

Ha thx! i missed that. Awesome!

i see that we note it here, but it likely bears repeating on the access token page.

also the docs show a seperate command for load testing when its now a flag on the cli command 🙂

ah, yeah, the CLI improvements are moving a bit faster than our docs. 🤦‍♂️ this is always the tricky part with docs — our old docs used to be OSS, and getting the new ones in a public repo is still on our list of TODOs. Hopefully once those are out there, folks can submit PRs for updates we miss

Sounds like a hint to me 😄 Ill try to get some of that done this week. its the very least i can do

lol, no no, not a hint at all — just me trying to be transparent. 🙂 very much appreciate you calling out the docs mismatch, thanks so much Mark! 🙏

haha I was only kidding. We've been sandboxing Janus, Jitsi etc - trying to decide what projects we want to go for first and which stack would be best suited. Loving the project so far!