Open source platform for stress free deployments, measured impact, and smarter decisions.

GrowthBook Users

set the channel topic: Ask questions here related to the Python SDK.

set the channel description: Ask questions here related to the Python SDK.

Hello Team. I’m confused with this line <https://github.com/growthbook/growthbook-python/blob/main/growthbook.py#L879>  it is joining base url with client_key like `<https://cdn.growthbook.io/api/features/client_key>. but from the <https://docs.growthbook.io/api/#tag/features/operation/getFeature|api doc,> the string after `features` can be a feature name. why here a client_key is added at the end of url ? isn’t client_key is used for authentication?

Hi Chylli,

Good morning and thank you for writing in.

Natasha here from the Support Engineering team assisting you today- nice to e-meet you!!

In regards to your query, it looks like you are querying about 2 different end points.

<https://github.com/growthbook/growthbook-python/blob/main/growthbook.py#L879|This line> is for the ​`api/features`​ which gets all features, which is why you will need the ​`client­_key`​, as with that key you may access all the <https://docs.growthbook.io/api/#tag/features/operation/listFeatures|features>.

However, the API doc you linked <https://docs.growthbook.io/api/#tag/features/operation/getFeature|here> is for ​`getFeature`​ singular (not all features but a singular feature).

Please, can you confirm which specific feature you wish to get?

Hope this helps to provide context into the distinction and looking forward to your response on the feature you wish to get :slightly_smiling_face:

Warm regards,

Natasha

Hi!

Our team is having issues with SDK Webhooks. We cannot get our "test" call to successfully be verified.
• We tried creating our verification in Python using hmac (same as the example in the documentation that is in Javascript)
• We tried using the "standard webhooks" package
• Last resort we tried the example in Javascript that was in the documentation, and that does not match either
Is it possible the "shared secret" field for the SDK Webhook is wrong or there is a bug?

<@U077LKXUEFQ> not sure if you’re the one to ping. ^

does anyone else have this issue on the python sdk currently :confused: <https://github.com/growthbook/growthbook-python/issues/33>

Hello,

I have been trying to use growthbook's OpenFeature python SDK provider to integrate with our application. I'm seeing strange behavior where it infinitely hangs, even if I follow the simple setup to a T.

I am able to get feature flag values by directly referencing the `GrowthBookClient` , but not when using the `OpenFeatureClient` as documented. Does anyone in these chats have context on setting this python SDK up?

Full details are listed in the issue: <https://github.com/growthbook/growthbook-openfeature-provider-python/issues/5> (edited)

Thanks for reporting this, <@U08P3AMJ1N1> ! I've shared with our SDK engineer. I'll also see if I can replicate/understand what's happening here.

This is a weird behavior and works fine for me with mocked features though.

I'm checking on it.

Please let me know if I can provide more info, either in slack or on the issue. I might be able to strip down to a barebones FastAPI project to isolate it further.

Okay, I was able to verify the above issue was fixed. Thanks so much for the timely response! I closed out the issue.

Unfortunately, I'm coming across another issue in the async integration of `growthbook-openfeature-provider-python`. The good news is I believe this would be a very easy fix if you are okay with upgrading the requirement for `openfeature-sdk` from 0.7.4 to 0.8.1, with a minor corresponding change.

Please let me know thoughts in this issue, or if I'm way off mark.

<https://github.com/growthbook/growthbook-openfeature-provider-python/issues/13>

Glad you got sorted! <@U07LDUS5Z8Q> might be able to help

Hey <@U077LKXUEFQ> <@U07LDUS5Z8Q>, happy Friday. No big rush but have you had a chance to look into the above yet?

<@U08P3AMJ1N1> This was resolved. Let me share the tag with you. --> `0.0.5`

<@U08P3AMJ1N1>, Just FYI..  `0.0.5` it addresses the issue with `run_async` returning a task instead of the expected result, but it executes a blocking operation in async contexts.

`0.0.6` will be released soon(_probably tomorrow. Still testing it_) that will have the complete async methods using the latest open feature provider.

This is huge, thanks so much for the update Madhu! I'll wait on 0.0.6 since we are working around it with hooks directly into some of the growthbook client implementation, and it's working fine so far. Will watch out for 0.0.6!