This message was deleted.

this is on the roadmap!

Hi, thank you for the great news! Just one question, will

gt checkout

get able to checkout the remote branch that aren't checked out locally yet in my machine? Being

gt get

requires the pre-knowledge of the exact name of the branch I would like to work on is such a pain point for me (especially considering that branch names are sometimes auto generated). At least in the meantime, if running

gt get

without params shows the interactive list of the all the branches that can be checked out (much like what

gt checkout

does now for local branches) it would be much helpful to check out other's branches and get engaged to it.

After we are the point where `get`'s behavior into sync, we'll also consider rolling it into

checkout

for branches you do not have locally. As for providing a list/typeahead of branches available to get, it's something that will probably be further down the line, but definitely something we'd like to build

That's wonderful. Thank you for the detailed explanation (I hope I didn't accidentally interrupted your sleep, though.). Have a nice day 🙂

You too! (I have an early flight this morning)