This message was deleted.
# feature-requests
s
This message was deleted.
d
can you clarify what you mean?
i'm hearing that the site is about 10% too large (assuming width?)
t
I keep the zoom level at 90%
d
ok great, that is helpful information
👍 1
t
At 90%, it feels much closer to what I remember from Meta. But to be fair, that was a year ago 🤷‍♂️
d
do you feel you're not getting what you need out of chrome's
cmd +
or
cmd -
feature?
t
That controls the same setting
I did
⌘ -
one time and then left it like that permanently
d
yep, just wanted to know if that works for you?
for me, 100% is too small 🙂 (i'm 37 and older eyesight)
t
It’s probably monitor and resolution dependent as well
d
it is
for readability we probably won't go any smaller than what we have currently at 100%, and i'd think we want to just let users control the zoom level to taste
👍 1
t
It just felt really “cluttered” to me at 100% because there wasn’t enough whitespace. If I’m in the minority, I have no problem living at 90%. But if the majority of users feel similarly, it might make sense to re-examine the default
d
does chrome remember your zoom preferences per domain? i forget.
t
It does, which is pretty nice
I think it’s less about the font size and more about the whitespace, now that I compare the various sizes
So perhaps it’s possible to increase whitespace while maintaining font size
If so, that’s probably ideal for me
d
our components tend to just go to full width more or less, which i think does hurt readability
👍 1
like on an ultrawide it just goes a full 3440px for me
it's likely we'll invest in shoring this up at some point 🙂
❤️ 1
t
And I’ll have to do the same for my own webapp!
d
indeed haha
we'd probably need to pull everything towards the center, including the top header bar, left sidebar, etc then set a full
max-width
on that and just let the sides of the page be the whitespace
👍 1
but i am not a designer so that's tbd of course