We've recently enabled the graphite merge queue. Why does graphite sometimes merge from a

gtmq_**

branch into

main

, and sometimes from a

gtmq_**

branch into a different

gtmq_**

branch? In the latter scenario, some of our CI (including our required check, merge_gatekeeper) doesn't run because it's only configured to run on merges to main. This is causing the PRs in the merge queue to time out. Is there a graphite merge queue setting that is causing this?

im using the

git worktree

flow as recommended in your guides. what combination of graphite commands can i use to know if the associated graphite stacked diff for a branch has been merged down? Asking for an agent

Is there a way to disable automatic rebasing? I am running into an issue similar to the one mentioned here. I have a github workflow that compares the base ref with the merge branch, but it's failing on partially merged stacks due to Graphite swapping out the base ref with a temp branch. I'm not sure if it's possible to delay CI checks until after rebase, but that would also be a solution.

I've been trying to automate certain interactions with

gt

through my IDE -- are there any flags to allow me to specify resolutions to prompts without an interactive response? The specific prompt I'm thinking of (don't have a sample right now) is the one that I see when I try to

gt submit --stack

when something downstack has been closed already. I get prompted to select between a couple different resolutions -- I can run the command with

--no-interactive

, but then it just fails. Usually there's some way to get around this by specifying the option I want to use before running the command with a flag or environment variable. Does

gt

have something like that?

how do I get insights for a team of 3 people?

How do I have diamond re-review the PR on every commit pushed?

I’ve been thinking of sending an internal survey to engineering to get a sense of if people have tried Graphite, if they like it, what features they use, etc. Has anyone done that? Would you mind sharing how you structured the survey, the things you looked for, etc.?

How do I get the file explorer to show all the time in the graphite review UI again? It only seems to appear on hover now

I like the new UI in general, but now it's become even harder to figure out which PRs of a stack I've already reviewed. Is there a way to find this information easily without clicking on each single PR? Thanks!

quick Q from a teammate: "What do the orange lines mean"?

is there a

gt

way to push all branches of a stack without creating the PRs?

hello! is it possible to customize the generated PR descriptions? It would be cool to be able to have formats that teams or individuals can determine

We use Github Enterprise cloud with managed users. The github domain is something like myorg.ghe.com. Is there a way to connect our ghe cloud account to graphite? It seems the current signup doesn't support enterprise with managed users. Here is the github doc explaining the difference: https://docs.github.com/en/enterprise-cloud@latest/admin/managing-iam/understanding-[…]rises/choosing-an-enterprise-type-for-github-enterprise-cloud Any help with this would be greatly appreciated.

Hi, is there a way to merge my entire stack at once instead of having each part of my stack merge one at a time ? When i open the merge modal this is all i see

Is it possible to connect to repository in organization I don't part of but has the application installed? I wanna know if I should try make Apache DataFusion install the app so I can better manage my PRs there

One of the pain points for my team is that we use JIRA and GH integration. Using Graphite MQ, the original PRs always get shown as closed. It's confusing for non-technical members and it actually kills any ability to do JIRA automations when a PR is "merged" (because Graphite MQ closes the original PR) Is there anyone with a similar situation w/any suggestions? It's problematic enough our team might have to revert back to GH merge queue 😞

how do i ignore checks / force merge in the new PR view? (this existed at some point in the old ui right? or am i misremembering entirely?)

Hello can the graphite cli be used by agents? I was wondering if there was any guidance on how I might get Devin to use the graphite CLI to do tasks that are more menial but would still need to be stacked with other existing branches. Thank you!

is it possible to pay by invoice? If so, what needs to happen to set that up? (only gathering info at this point)

Is it possible to get Insights for a team of ~15 people? I noticed in the docs it's in beta mode and don't see a tab for it anywhere on my account.

When I try to enable CI settings, I get this message:

Merge queue optimizations require Graphite to be included in the GitHub setting “Allow specified actors to bypass required pull requests.” Add this via classic branch protection rule or as a ruleset in GitHub and try again. Note: if you choose to use a ruleset, Graphite will not be able to validate your configuration. Learn more.

I use rulesets Graphite proceeds to be unable to validate my configuration So I can't enable CI settings. How do I get around this?

is it possible to see diamond analysis in an already merged pr?

Struggling to get my Graphite Merge Queue working on a protected branch/repo.

Diamond comment exclusions in a multi-language monorepo At Isometric we have just one monorepo, where most code is either Typescript or Python. Conveniently located in

/typescript

and

/python

subdirs. We have custom Diamond rules for both Typescript and Python – both are file-based. The problem is that Diamond applies irrelevant Typescript rules to Python files, and vice versa. What's the best way to deal with it? (1) Add comment exclusion rule like in the screenshot. Will this work? Is Diamond aware of the name of the custom rules it's evaluating? Is it aware of the locations of the files it reviews? (2) Add to our monorepo a file that matches the glob of Typescript/Python custom rules, explaining where to apply them We have 17 Typescript rule files and 4 Python rules files. I'm not sure how they get concatenated into a single set of instructions. If we do pursue this path, should we strive for the "only apply these rules to those files" disclaimer to appear at the top or bottom? I assume the files get concatenated in alphabetical order, but I'm not sure! (3) Some other way?

Good afternoon 🙂 I would have a small question about the CI optimization with github actions. If we set the settings to: • Run on bottom PR • Run on topmost PR Let's say that an engineer open a stack with 4 PRs, it'll run on PR1 and PR4, do they still have the option to merge only the 3 first PRs ? In the worst case, the fourth PR is fixing a bug on PR3 so I was curious what is behavior there before checking it for my org 🙂 Same if they remove the 4th PR from the stack, can they merge a stack where the topmost was not checked anymore ? Thank you a lot 🙂

Hi, in the new PR UI, how can I see the checks/labels/reviewers sidebar that normally shows on the right hand side? I tend to have my browser window not full width and it's just small enough to trigger the responsive layout and hide the sidebar. Is there any way to still show it on a smaller screen? I currently just zoom out to get it to show up

How do I turn on/try Chat after declining it at first?

What controls the ability to "@" users in the discussions of a PR? Is it a github related permission? I have users actively creating PR's and working in graphite but I can't @ them for some reason in any comments.

Sometimes we see required CI tests fail to be triggered when there are updates made to the branch, which usually requires GT sync and GT submit to trigger the CI again, but occasionally that does not work. Any idea what might be happening and how to resolve?

How do I switch

CI Settings

ON for the repo which uses

Rulesets

instead of

Classic branch protection rule

?