So has anyone ever seen this one before ...
I'm t...
# community-supportj
James Daugherty
09/05/2025, 3:18 PMSo has anyone ever seen this one before ...
I'm trying to test a reproducible build, the project has this code in it:
tasks.withType(AbstractArchiveTask).configureEach {
preserveFileTimestamps = false // to prevent timestamp mismatches
reproducibleFileOrder = true // to keep the same ordering
// to avoid platform specific defaults, set the permissions consistently
filePermissions { permissions ->
permissions.unix(0644)
}
dirPermissions { permissions ->
permissions.unix(0755)
}
}
My sources jar is created with a different ordering of file names when run locally vs in orbstack vs in dockerdesktop ... orbstack & locally are matching. It's only differeing in docker desktop.
James Daugherty
09/05/2025, 3:19 PMI actually have 2 source sets, and the ordering difference is the order the sources sets are processed in ...
v
Vampire
09/05/2025, 4:01 PMSounds like a bug to me
👆 1
Vampire
09/05/2025, 4:02 PMIf you set reproducible file order on an archive task, that archive should have the files in reproducible file order no matter how or in which order you add files.
j
James Daugherty
09/05/2025, 4:12 PMI think it's b/c our source sets aren't added in a deterministic order
James Daugherty
09/05/2025, 4:12 PMsince it just does an eachDir { } over a children set
James Daugherty
09/05/2025, 4:13 PMbut i'm still surprised there isn't a specific sort across source sets
James Daugherty
09/05/2025, 4:13 PMI'll continue debugging