Can one have `@Input` definitions in an `abstract`...
# community-support
t
Can one have
@Input
definitions in an
abstract
base class of some custom task? It seems as if no code is generated for
abstract val something: Property<String>
, instead an error is thrown
Cannot have abstract method MyAbstractClass.getSomething(): Property<String>
. So code / configuration sharing via a base class is not supported then I guess?
Hrm, no, found prior art with
AbstractKotlinCompile
, this has annotated properties as well... damn.
Ah, nevermind, I had another conflicting protected
getSomething
method on the same class. Stupid me.
👌 1