This message was deleted.
# plugin-development
s
This message was deleted.
a
1. yeah that looks like a bug, the names aren't being filtered along with the elements. 2. pass! 3. I'd create a new container and use
addAllLater {}
and a
provider {}
and filter the source containers using
matching {}
(see
combinedContainer
in the example above)
it looks like
combinedContainer.names
is bugged too - it doesn't return any names:
expect combinedContainer has 6 names: , 6 objects: five, four, nine, one, six, two
v
I guess this is because names is lazy-safe while matching is eager if not combined with
configureEach
. But yeah, looks like a bug to me too.