Certainly! The original question was about how YNAB (You Need A Budget), a budgeting software, handles inflow transactions when they are directly assigned to a specific budget category, rather than being marked as "Ready to Assign" and then distributed to categories. In YNAB, you can set up budget categories with specific funding goals or targets, such as allocating $100 per month for clothing. If you receive money specifically for that category, like a $50 gift for clothing, you might directly assign that inflow to the clothing category. However, YNAB doesn't treat this direct inflow as money that has been "assigned" to meet your budgeting goal. Instead, it sees it as a refund or reimbursement, which means your category balance increases, but your goal progress does not. So, if you then move $50 out of the clothing category because you only need $100 there, YNAB will show a yellow warning, indicating that you haven't met your assigned funding goal for the month, even though there's enough money in the category to cover your planned spending. The confusion arises because users expect that any inflow to a category should count towards meeting the funding goal, but YNAB differentiates between assigned funds (from your "Ready to Assign" pool) and direct inflows (like refunds or gifts), which do not count towards goal progress. A workaround mentioned in the thread is to use a new feature that allows you to snooze a target for the rest of the month, which can help avoid the annoyance of seeing the yellow warning. In summary, for YNAB, the source of funds matters when it comes to meeting budgeting goals. Money assigned from your general pool counts towards goals, while direct inflows to a category do not. This distinction is important for new users to understand to effectively manage their budget within YNAB's system.